Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Automated cherry pick of #86001: Fix IPv6 addresses lost issue in pure ipv6 vsphere #86720

Conversation

hubv
Copy link
Contributor

@hubv hubv commented Dec 30, 2019

Cherry pick of #86001 on release-1.17.

#86001: Fix IPv6 addresses lost issue in pure ipv6 vsphere

For details on the cherry pick process, see the cherry pick requests page.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hubv: All 'parent' PRs of a cherry-pick PR must have one of the "release-note" or "release-note-action-required" labels, or this PR must follow the standard/parent release note labeling requirement.

The following parent PRs have neither the "release-note" nor the "release-note-action-required" labels: #86001.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.17 milestone Dec 30, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 30, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hubv: Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 30, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @hubv. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 30, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/cloudprovider sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 30, 2019
@hubv
Copy link
Contributor Author

hubv commented Dec 30, 2019

/release-note-none

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Dec 30, 2019
@hubv
Copy link
Contributor Author

hubv commented Dec 30, 2019

/sig cloud-provider
/kind bug
/assign divyenpatel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. and removed needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 30, 2019
@hubv
Copy link
Contributor Author

hubv commented Jan 3, 2020

Hi, @divyenpatel @imkin @SandeepPissay
We are blocking by this issue.
Could you help to review and merge it into 1.17.x?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hubv: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: hubv.

Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

/cc

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@divyenpatel
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jan 6, 2020
@divyenpatel
Copy link
Member

@hubv please add release note for this PR.

@tpepper
Copy link
Member

tpepper commented Jan 6, 2020

/priority important-soon
from parent PR

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Jan 6, 2020
@hubv
Copy link
Contributor Author

hubv commented Jan 7, 2020

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-gce-100-performance

@divyenpatel
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 7, 2020
@divyenpatel
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: divyenpatel, hubv

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 7, 2020
@hubv
Copy link
Contributor Author

hubv commented Jan 8, 2020

@tpepper
/kubernetes/patch-release-team
@kubernetes/patch-release-team
Thanks

@idealhack idealhack added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jan 9, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. label Jan 9, 2020
@hubv
Copy link
Contributor Author

hubv commented Jan 9, 2020

/test pull-kubernetes-integration

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 4fe584a into kubernetes:release-1.17 Jan 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/cloudprovider cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants