Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a proxy test #9698

Merged
2 commits merged into from Jun 13, 2015
Merged

Add a proxy test #9698

2 commits merged into from Jun 13, 2015

Conversation

lavalamp
Copy link
Member

Fixes #9533

@lavalamp lavalamp force-pushed the e2eTestFix branch 2 times, most recently from 15bf020 to aae846d Compare June 12, 2015 01:29
@lavalamp
Copy link
Member Author

Note this depends on a fix in #9592.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 12, 2015

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 39e7e73a69d90db2b127fb5a5f5108bb1d40686e.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 12, 2015

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 15bf0200f368c7a52ba8aae46b4b1dbb47b4fd70.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 12, 2015

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit aae846db4a28bed805e0d2febd9cadade08b7a6e.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 12, 2015

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 8eeb948ee846c6e4f8e519c3770148f96c85662f.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 12, 2015

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit 42292bc76f324a08b3098e37595dd7540c17cc6c.

@@ -103,3 +103,47 @@ func (f *Framework) WaitForPodRunning(podName string) error {
func (f *Framework) TestContainerOutput(scenarioName string, pod *api.Pod, expectedOutput []string) {
testContainerOutputInNamespace(scenarioName, f.Client, pod, expectedOutput, f.Namespace.Name)
}

func (f *Framework) WaitForEndpoints(serviceName string) error {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Document what this does. The name seems to indicate it waits for all to be ok, but the implementation just waits for one to be ok.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will fix. It's confusing because we named a single object "Endpoints"...

@brendandburns
Copy link
Contributor

Small comments. Shippable is a flake, hit it again.

@lavalamp
Copy link
Member Author

Updated. This won't pass e2e until #9592 is merged.

@k8s-bot
Copy link

k8s-bot commented Jun 13, 2015

GCE e2e build/test failed for commit e29245f.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 13, 2015

LGTM. #9592 has been merged. Merging this as it's a very useful signal and the change is limited to a single test, and easy to roll back if required. I'll keep an eye on it over the weekend.

@ghost ghost added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 13, 2015
ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 13, 2015
@ghost ghost merged commit 921011f into kubernetes:master Jun 13, 2015
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 13, 2015

@k8s-bot test this please

@lavalamp lavalamp unassigned ghost Aug 12, 2015
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/test-infra lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants