-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
remove double dash #9864
remove double dash #9864
Conversation
GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 1021f6c34e2c3791b281deaa0490595ffb222d3d. |
@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ With the IP-per-pod model, all user containers within a pod behave as if they ar | |||
|
|||
In addition to avoiding the aforementioned problems with dynamic port allocation, this approach reduces friction for applications moving from the world of uncontainerized apps on physical or virtual hosts to containers within pods. People running application stacks together on the same host have already figured out how to make ports not conflict (e.g., by configuring them through environment variables) and have arranged for clients to find them. | |||
|
|||
The approach does reduce isolation between containers within a pod -- ports could conflict, and there couldn't be private ports across containers within a pod, but applications requiring their own port spaces could just run as separate pods and processes requiring private communication could run within the same container. Besides, the premise of pods is that containers within a pod share some resources (volumes, cpu, ram, etc.) and therefore expect and tolerate reduced isolation. Additionally, the user can control what containers belong to the same pod whereas, in general, they don't control what pods land together on a host. | |||
The approach does reduce isolation between containers within a pod - ports could conflict, and there couldn't be private ports across containers within a pod, but applications requiring their own port spaces could just run as separate pods and processes requiring private communication could run within the same container. Besides, the premise of pods is that containers within a pod share some resources (volumes, cpu, ram, etc.) and therefore expect and tolerate reduced isolation. Additionally, the user can control what containers belong to the same pod whereas, in general, they don't control what pods land together on a host. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The correct punctuation here is an em dash. Suggest changing --
to —
, which will render nicely — like that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. I wasn't aware of that
1021f6c
to
7b403ed
Compare
@erictune , please check if this is better. |
GCE e2e build/test passed for commit 7b403ed. |
lgtm |
remove double dash
No description provided.