Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Masking http(s)_proxy password from startup output. #17116

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Sep 20, 2023

Conversation

rmsilva1973
Copy link
Contributor

fixes #17115

@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Aug 24, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 24, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @rmsilva1973!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/minikube 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/minikube has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Aug 24, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @rmsilva1973. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 24, 2023
@minikube-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Aug 24, 2023
@medyagh
Copy link
Member

medyagh commented Aug 30, 2023

fixes #17115

Can u plz post a before after this PR output (with dummy passwords)

@rmsilva1973
Copy link
Contributor Author

rmsilva1973 commented Aug 31, 2023

@medyagh Sure. Here is a before

image

@rmsilva1973
Copy link
Contributor Author

And here's the after:

image

@rmsilva1973
Copy link
Contributor Author

@medyagh BTW: don't worry. The password on the first screenshot is completely bogus. It's not my password. 😉

@medyagh
Copy link
Member

medyagh commented Aug 31, 2023

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 31, 2023
@@ -47,6 +49,16 @@ func showVersionInfo(k8sVersion string, cr cruntime.Manager) {
out.Infof("opt {{.docker_option}}", out.V{"docker_option": v})
}
for _, v := range config.DockerEnv {
parts := strings.Split(v, "=")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I recommend, putting this into a func and then add unit tests for them.
in config_test.go

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@medyagh Will do that. But turns out "make test" is completely inconsistent in my WSL/Ubuntu-22.04. This function:

func TestValidatePorts(t *testing.T) {

is failing on different ports each time I run "make test" and sometimes it's even running without any failures. To be sure it's not related to my commit, I ran it on the original repo and it's behaving the same way. Guess I'll try to figure out what's happening here before going any further. Perhaps should I file a new issue? What do you think?

Anyway... I'll also test on Ubuntu running on a Virtual Machine to rule out some WSL related quirky behaviour. 🤔

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@medyagh Moved the mask password to a func and implemented config_test.go. Let me know how it looks.

@minikube-pr-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@minikube-pr-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 2, 2023
@minikube-pr-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@minikube-pr-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@minikube-pr-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@minikube-pr-bot

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@medyagh medyagh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thank you very much the PR looks much better, just a few more changes and it would be ready to go

output: "myDockerOption=value",
},
{
input: "http_proxy=http://myproxy.company.com",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lets use minikube domain name here, so we dont get spam

minikube.sigs.k8s.io

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done!

output: "HTTPS_PROXY=http://jdoe@myproxy.company.com:8080",
},
{
input: "https_proxy=https://mary:am$uT8zB(rP@myproxy.company.com:8080",
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lets make this word obvious it is a fake password
such as
mary@iam$Fake!password

also lets make more example of password with other types of characters such as ' %&* (things that could break our regex)

Copy link
Contributor Author

@rmsilva1973 rmsilva1973 Sep 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Improved the regex robustness and the tests. I can't remember torturing regexes that much since I used to parse sendmail logs on SunOS 4.. 😊
Anyway, this is my first PR and I'm thankful for the feedback. I hope it's better now.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 6, 2023
@minikube-pr-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@minikube-pr-bot

This comment has been minimized.

@medyagh
Copy link
Member

medyagh commented Sep 6, 2023

/retest-this-please

@minikube-pr-bot
Copy link

kvm2 driver with docker runtime

+----------------+----------+---------------------+
|    COMMAND     | MINIKUBE | MINIKUBE (PR 17116) |
+----------------+----------+---------------------+
| minikube start | 51.4s    | 51.1s               |
| enable ingress | 27.7s    | 28.1s               |
+----------------+----------+---------------------+

Times for minikube start: 50.4s 51.4s 51.7s 51.6s 52.0s
Times for minikube (PR 17116) start: 51.7s 51.1s 50.6s 49.9s 52.2s

Times for minikube ingress: 26.7s 28.3s 27.7s 27.7s 28.2s
Times for minikube (PR 17116) ingress: 28.2s 27.7s 27.7s 27.8s 29.1s

docker driver with docker runtime

+----------------+----------+---------------------+
|    COMMAND     | MINIKUBE | MINIKUBE (PR 17116) |
+----------------+----------+---------------------+
| minikube start | 24.0s    | 23.9s               |
| enable ingress | 21.1s    | 21.2s               |
+----------------+----------+---------------------+

Times for minikube start: 22.6s 22.2s 24.4s 24.7s 25.9s
Times for minikube (PR 17116) start: 22.1s 25.2s 25.3s 24.3s 22.4s

Times for minikube ingress: 20.8s 20.8s 20.9s 21.9s 20.9s
Times for minikube (PR 17116) ingress: 20.9s 21.3s 21.9s 20.9s 20.9s

docker driver with containerd runtime

+-------------------+----------+---------------------+
|      COMMAND      | MINIKUBE | MINIKUBE (PR 17116) |
+-------------------+----------+---------------------+
| minikube start    | 23.8s    | 23.2s               |
| ⚠️  enable ingress | 31.5s    | 41.0s ⚠️             |
+-------------------+----------+---------------------+

Times for minikube (PR 17116) ingress: 31.4s 79.4s 31.4s 31.3s 31.3s
Times for minikube ingress: 32.3s 31.3s 31.3s 31.4s 31.4s

Times for minikube start: 24.1s 24.3s 23.5s 23.2s 24.0s
Times for minikube (PR 17116) start: 20.5s 24.2s 24.0s 23.2s 23.8s

@minikube-pr-bot
Copy link

These are the flake rates of all failed tests.

Environment Failed Tests Flake Rate (%)
Hyperkit_macOS TestAddons/Setup (gopogh) 4.46 (chart)
Hyperkit_macOS TestCertOptions (gopogh) 5.10 (chart)
Docker_Linux_crio_arm64 TestPause/serial/SecondStartNoReconfiguration (gopogh) 10.98 (chart)
QEMU_macOS TestFunctional/parallel/TunnelCmd/serial/RunSecondTunnel (gopogh) 42.48 (chart)

To see the flake rates of all tests by environment, click here.

@rmsilva1973
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @medyagh . Do you think it's ok to merge now?

@medyagh
Copy link
Member

medyagh commented Sep 20, 2023

thank you for this contribution @rmsilva1973 I look forward to see more contributions from you

@medyagh
Copy link
Member

medyagh commented Sep 20, 2023

/lgtm

@medyagh medyagh merged commit e68882d into kubernetes:master Sep 20, 2023
27 of 41 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 20, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: medyagh, rmsilva1973

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Upon start, minikube splashes PROXY variables with password on the screen
5 participants