-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bad /assign
causes "Error handling GenericCommentEvent" instead of user feedback
#15811
Comments
cc @cjwagner this used to report an error when trying to assign |
After running a few tests, it seems GitHub API will ignore requests for assignment if the user cannot be assigned the issue. The plugin uses the API's response which lists the assigned users to figure out the list of ignored users and adds a comment accordingly. However, if any of the specified users do not exist (or, interestingly, are an organisation account), GitHub API will return 404, which the plugin does not handle for assignment (for reviews it handles 422 code by making separate requests per login) The |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta. |
@fejta-bot: Closing this issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
We saw someones
/assign <someone> please take a look
command to log an error instead of replying to the user that "please, take, a, look" could not be assigned. It used to do this in the past.Log:
See: openshift/console#3765 (comment)
xref: https://github.com/openshift/release/issues/6581
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: