New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modify kubernetes_verify scenario to pass env vars into job #10534
Conversation
How about let's try to make the I don't think we want to touch this scenario anymore, we should migrate and rip the python script :-) |
you probably know, any idea why https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/blob/28b965a8c0dcc941dad94e2ceeab72049a173527/hack/verify-godep-licenses.sh#L24 is resolved to |
It can’t resolve the what the upstream remote is, because it’s not a proper clone when you do it with podutils |
doh... which means I need to add remote and do a fetch? |
I think so.. the script is trying to compare if there are changes locally compared to upstream/master |
65a71ed
to
90e333b
Compare
/pony this is fine |
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I fixed the lint error here. If we don't have a clear path to podutils for the verify job, I'd like to merge this.. it will shave up to 30 minutes off the verify job :) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the friday before christmas is the best time to change test-infra python job scripts! with docker, bash, python and more! 🎉
/lgtm
/approve
/hold cancel
/this-is-fine
/sig this-is-fine
/pony this is fine
/woof
/meow space
Thanks Christoph 🙃
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: e1c48cf92e122178354a5b1d0b1ab2d27b54e5f5
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: BenTheElder, cblecker The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@cblecker: Updated the
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
I will be VERY HAPPY when we can get rid of this scenario. Until then, I had to modify it and create a couple new flags to be able to pass options into the job.
Extra eyes on the python might be required, as it's not my strongest language.
/assign @krzyzacy