Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

store workload name in the summary object #140

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 16, 2023

Conversation

rcohencyberarmor
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: rcohencyberarmor <rcohen@armosec.io>
@codiumai-pr-agent
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: Storing workload name in the summary object
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: True
  • Focused PR: Yes, all changes are related to storing the workload name in the summary object.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • General suggestions: The PR seems to be well structured and focused on a single task. It is good to see that tests have been added for the new functionality. However, it would be beneficial to include a description in the PR to provide context and explain the changes.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: repositories/apiserver.go
      suggestion: Consider handling the error returned by getCVESummaryK8sResourceName(ctx) in a more informative way. Instead of simply returning the error, you could log it or add more context to it. This would make debugging easier if the function fails. [medium]
      relevant line: return err

    • relevant file: repositories/apiserver_test.go
      suggestion: It would be beneficial to add a test case where the getCVESummaryK8sResourceName(ctx) function fails. This would help ensure that the function behaves as expected in all scenarios. [medium]
      relevant line: name, err := getCVESummaryK8sResourceName(ctx)

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@rcohencyberarmor rcohencyberarmor added the release Create release label Aug 16, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

matthyx
matthyx previously approved these changes Aug 16, 2023
repositories/apiserver.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: rcohencyberarmor <rcohen@armosec.io>
Copy link
Contributor

@matthyx matthyx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@github-actions
Copy link

Summary:

  • License scan: failure
  • Credentials scan: success
  • Vulnerabilities scan: failure
  • Unit test: success
  • Go linting: success

@rcohencyberarmor rcohencyberarmor merged commit 50b17cb into main Aug 16, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
dwertent pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 31, 2023
* store workload name in the summary object

Signed-off-by: rcohencyberarmor <rcohen@armosec.io>

* change error

Signed-off-by: rcohencyberarmor <rcohen@armosec.io>

---------

Signed-off-by: rcohencyberarmor <rcohen@armosec.io>
Co-authored-by: rcohencyberarmor <rcohen@armosec.io>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
release Create release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants