Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add func IsFixedByNetworkPolicy #151

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024
Merged

add func IsFixedByNetworkPolicy #151

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 13, 2024

Conversation

YiscahLevySilas1
Copy link
Contributor

@YiscahLevySilas1 YiscahLevySilas1 commented Mar 13, 2024

Type

enhancement


Description

  • Added a new constant and method to enhance the Control struct functionality:
    • ControlAttributeKeyIsFixedByNetworkPolicy constant for the attribute key.
    • IsFixedByNetworkPolicy() method to evaluate if a control is fixed by a network policy, enhancing control analysis capabilities.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files
Enhancement
datastructuresmethods.go
Add Method to Check if Control is Fixed by Network Policy

reporthandling/datastructuresmethods.go

  • Introduced a new constant ControlAttributeKeyIsFixedByNetworkPolicy to
    represent the attribute key for checking if a control is fixed by a
    network policy.
  • Added a new method IsFixedByNetworkPolicy() to the Control struct to
    check if the control is fixed by a network policy.
  • +17/-1   

    PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <yiscahls@armosec.io>
    @codiumai-pr-agent codiumai-pr-agent bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 13, 2024
    Copy link

    PR Description updated to latest commit (edef4dd)

    Copy link

    PR Review

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the changes are straightforward and localized to a specific functionality within the codebase. The addition of a constant and a method within an existing struct is not complex, but understanding the context and ensuring the method behaves as expected in all scenarios requires some domain knowledge.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    No

    🔍 Possible issues

    Missing Validation: The IsFixedByNetworkPolicy method assumes the Attributes map is well-formed and that the isFixedByNetworkPolicy attribute, if present, is of type bool. While this is a reasonable assumption, there's no explicit error handling or logging for cases where the attribute exists but is of a different type, which could lead to silent failures or unexpected behavior.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No


    ✨ Review tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

    /review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_reviewer]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Utilizing extra instructions

    The review tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_reviewer] # /review #
    extra_instructions="""
    In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    How to enable\disable automation
    • When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the review tool is:
    pr_commands = ["/review", ...]
    

    meaning the review tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration.
    Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations

    Auto-labels

    The review tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR:

    • a possible security issue label, that detects possible security issues (enable_review_labels_security flag)
    • a Review effort [1-5]: x label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (enable_review_labels_effort flag)
    Extra sub-tools

    The review tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR.
    It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case.
    Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example:
    require_score_review, require_soc2_ticket, and more.

    Auto-approve PRs

    By invoking:

    /review auto_approve
    

    The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval.

    To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following:

    [pr_reviewer]
    enable_auto_approval = true
    

    (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository)

    You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the estimated_review_effort is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag:

    [pr_reviewer]
    maximal_review_effort = 5
    
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    Copy link

    codiumai-pr-agent bot commented Mar 13, 2024

    PR Code Suggestions

    CategorySuggestions                                                                                                                                                       
    Best practice
    Simplify constant definitions by removing explicit string type declarations.

    Consider using a more idiomatic way of defining string constants in Go. Instead of
    explicitly typing each constant, you can rely on implicit typing for cleaner code.

    reporthandling/datastructuresmethods.go [16-17]

     const (
    -	ActionRequiredAttribute                   string = "actionRequired"
    -	ControlAttributeKeyIsFixedByNetworkPolicy string = "isFixedByNetworkPolicy"
    +	ActionRequiredAttribute                   = "actionRequired"
    +	ControlAttributeKeyIsFixedByNetworkPolicy = "isFixedByNetworkPolicy"
     )
     
    Add Go idiomatic documentation for the IsFixedByNetworkPolicy method.

    It's a good practice to document all exported functions, methods, and types in Go. Adding
    a comment for the IsFixedByNetworkPolicy method that begins with the method name will make
    your code more Go idiomatic and easier to understand for other developers.

    reporthandling/datastructuresmethods.go [449-450]

    -// returns true if control has attribute "isFixedByNetworkPolicy" and its value is true
    +// IsFixedByNetworkPolicy returns true if control has attribute "isFixedByNetworkPolicy" and its value is true
     func (control *Control) IsFixedByNetworkPolicy() bool {
     
    Maintainability
    Extract attribute checking logic into a separate method for better readability.

    To improve code readability and maintainability, consider extracting the attribute
    checking logic into a separate method. This will make IsFixedByNetworkPolicy more concise
    and focused on its primary responsibility.

    reporthandling/datastructuresmethods.go [454-456]

    -if v, exist := control.Attributes[ControlAttributeKeyIsFixedByNetworkPolicy]; exist {
    -	if isFixedByNetworkPolicy, ok := v.(bool); ok {
    -		return isFixedByNetworkPolicy
    -	}
    +if isFixedByNetworkPolicy, ok := control.getAttributeBool(ControlAttributeKeyIsFixedByNetworkPolicy); ok {
    +	return isFixedByNetworkPolicy
     }
     
    +// Example of the extracted method:
    +func (control *Control) getAttributeBool(key string) (bool, bool) {
    +	if control.Attributes == nil {
    +		return false, false
    +	}
    +	if v, exist := control.Attributes[key]; exist {
    +		if boolVal, ok := v.(bool); ok {
    +			return boolVal, true
    +		}
    +	}
    +	return false, false
    +}
    +
    Enhancement
    Improve error handling in IsFixedByNetworkPolicy for unexpected attribute types.

    To ensure that the method IsFixedByNetworkPolicy is robust, consider adding a log
    statement or returning an error when the attribute exists but is not of type bool. This
    will help in debugging and understanding why the method returns false in unexpected
    scenarios.

    reporthandling/datastructuresmethods.go [454-456]

     if v, exist := control.Attributes[ControlAttributeKeyIsFixedByNetworkPolicy]; exist {
     	if isFixedByNetworkPolicy, ok := v.(bool); ok {
     		return isFixedByNetworkPolicy
    +	} else {
    +		// Log unexpected type or handle error
     	}
     }
     
    Performance
    Simplify IsFixedByNetworkPolicy by using a direct return strategy.

    For better performance and readability, consider using a direct return in the
    IsFixedByNetworkPolicy method instead of using an if-else structure. This simplifies the
    method and reduces the number of lines of code.

    reporthandling/datastructuresmethods.go [451-459]

    -if control.Attributes == nil {
    -	return false
    -}
    -if v, exist := control.Attributes[ControlAttributeKeyIsFixedByNetworkPolicy]; exist {
    -	if isFixedByNetworkPolicy, ok := v.(bool); ok {
    -		return isFixedByNetworkPolicy
    +if control.Attributes != nil {
    +	if v, exist := control.Attributes[ControlAttributeKeyIsFixedByNetworkPolicy]; exist {
    +		if isFixedByNetworkPolicy, ok := v.(bool); ok {
    +			return isFixedByNetworkPolicy
    +		}
     	}
     }
     return false
     

    ✨ Improve tool usage guide:

    Overview:
    The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
    When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

    /improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...
    

    With a configuration file, use the following template:

    [pr_code_suggestions]
    some_config1=...
    some_config2=...
    
    Enabling\disabling automation

    When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is:

    pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]
    

    meaning the improve tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.

    Utilizing extra instructions

    Extra instructions are very important for the improve tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project.

    Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on.

    Examples for extra instructions:

    [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
    extra_instructions="""
    Emphasize the following aspects:
    - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases?
    - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand?
    - Is the code logic efficient?
    ...
    """
    

    Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.

    A note on code suggestions quality
    • While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically.
    • Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base.
    • Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool
    • With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
    More PR-Agent commands

    To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:

    • /review: Request a review of your Pull Request.
    • /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
    • /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback.
    • /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR.
    • /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.
    • /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR.
    • /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents.
    • /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component.

    See the tools guide for more details.
    To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

    See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

    kooomix
    kooomix previously approved these changes Mar 13, 2024
    Signed-off-by: YiscahLevySilas1 <yiscahls@armosec.io>
    @amirmalka amirmalka merged commit d0cb0db into main Mar 13, 2024
    4 checks passed
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    None yet

    3 participants