-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 873
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: removes default
parameter name for terraform provider
#5468
Fix: removes default
parameter name for terraform provider
#5468
Conversation
Codecov ReportBase: 61.22% // Head: 55.23% // Decreases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5468 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 61.22% 55.23% -6.00%
==========================================
Files 310 175 -135
Lines 47160 26120 -21040
==========================================
- Hits 28875 14428 -14447
+ Misses 15291 10262 -5029
+ Partials 2994 1430 -1564
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The user prompt should only show when the config will be override. User shouldn't be asked twice when creating a new config.
Signed-off-by: afzalbin64 <afzal442@gmail.com>
57fc4f1
to
dd530bf
Compare
default
parameter name for terraform provider
After offline talk with @afzalbin64 . #5427 should be fixed by remove default provider name ("default") in config templates. This PR can be closed. |
a7e75d5
to
5ab2e4e
Compare
Please fix the test. |
Thanks. I will take care. |
Signed-off-by: afzalbin64 <afzal442@gmail.com> undo the changes to typo fixes minor typos in go_test files updates config_test to support name as required param
dc1181e
to
51c2650
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be backported to 1.7?
Successfully created backport PR #5516 for |
…a#5468) Co-authored-by: afzalbin64 <afzal442@gmail.com> Fixes kubevela#5427
Description of your changes
Fixes #5427
I have:
make reviewable
to ensure this PR is ready for review.backport release-x.y
labels to auto-backport this PR if necessary.How has this code been tested
Special notes for your reviewer