Feat: support mark stage in gc when workflow failed

[Somefive]

Description of your changes

Refactor #5812

I have:

• Read and followed KubeVela's contribution process.
• Related Docs updated properly. In a new feature or configuration option, an update to the documentation is necessary.
• Run make reviewable to ensure this PR is ready for review.
• Added backport release-x.y labels to auto-backport this PR if necessary.

How has this code been tested

Special notes for your reviewer

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and project coverage change: -0.34 ⚠️

Comparison is base (feb8199) 61.39% compared to head (80dc218) 61.05%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5882      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   61.39%   61.05%   -0.34%     
==========================================
  Files         223      224       +1     
  Lines       30983    30994      +11     
==========================================
- Hits        19022    18924      -98     
- Misses      10187    10296     +109     
  Partials     1774     1774              

Flag	Coverage Δ
core-unittests	55.85% <100.00%> (-0.03%)	⬇️
e2e-multicluster-test	24.90% <42.85%> (-0.15%)	⬇️
e2etests	26.71% <42.85%> (-0.39%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...dev/v1alpha2/application/application_controller.go	82.88% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/resourcekeeper/context.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/resourcekeeper/gc.go	78.96% <100.00%> (+0.37%)	⬆️

... and 14 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[Somefive]

/cc @zxbyoyoyo