Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chore: Add the package release shell #767

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 16, 2023

Conversation

barnettZQG
Copy link
Collaborator

Description of your changes

Fixes #

I have:

  • Read and followed KubeVela's contribution process.
  • Related Docs updated properly. In a new feature or configuration option, an update to the documentation is necessary.
  • Run yarn lint to ensure the frontend changes are ready for review.
  • Run make reviewableto ensure the server changes are ready for review.
  • Added backport release-x.y labels to auto-backport this PR if necessary.

Special notes for your reviewer

Signed-off-by: barnettZQG <barnett.zqg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: barnettZQG <barnett.zqg@gmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 13, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.06 🎉

Comparison is base (7a3ea7d) 61.05% compared to head (9da9420) 61.12%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #767      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   61.05%   61.12%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         106      107       +1     
  Lines       18961    19010      +49     
==========================================
+ Hits        11576    11619      +43     
+ Misses       5961     5953       -8     
- Partials     1424     1438      +14     
Flag Coverage Δ
apiserver-unittests 33.60% <ø> (+0.02%) ⬆️
server-e2e-tests 49.93% <ø> (+0.03%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

see 15 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Contributor

@wonderflow wonderflow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does the yarn.lock necessary?

@barnettZQG
Copy link
Collaborator Author

does the yarn.lock necessary?

Yes, it is required.

Signed-off-by: barnettZQG <barnett.zqg@gmail.com>
@barnettZQG barnettZQG merged commit 3cae9e1 into kubevela:main Apr 16, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants