Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bug 2138199: Add 'Red Hat - Tech Preview' provider filter #939

Merged

Conversation

avivtur
Copy link
Member

@avivtur avivtur commented Oct 31, 2022

Signed-off-by: Aviv Turgeman aturgema@redhat.com

✏️ Description

Add 'Red Hat - Tech Preview' provider filter to Template list view

🎥 Demo

After:

tech-preview.mp4

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 31, 2022

@avivtur: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2138199, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.13.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

Bug 2138199: Add 'Red Hat - Tech Preview' provider filter

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved This issue is something we want to fix label Oct 31, 2022
@avivtur
Copy link
Member Author

avivtur commented Oct 31, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 31, 2022

@avivtur: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2138199, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.13.0" release, but it targets "4.12.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Signed-off-by: Aviv Turgeman <aturgema@redhat.com>
@avivtur
Copy link
Member Author

avivtur commented Oct 31, 2022

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 31, 2022

@avivtur: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2138199, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.13.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lkladnit

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 31, 2022

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: lkladnit.

Note that only kubevirt-ui members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@avivtur: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2138199, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.13.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @lkladnit

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@metalice
Copy link
Member

metalice commented Nov 2, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Passed code review, ready for merge label Nov 2, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 2, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: avivtur, metalice

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 4eff222 into kubevirt-ui:main Nov 2, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Nov 2, 2022

@avivtur: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2138199 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

Bug 2138199: Add 'Red Hat - Tech Preview' provider filter

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved This issue is something we want to fix bugzilla/severity-medium bugzilla/valid-bug lgtm Passed code review, ready for merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants