-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 243
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix operator_test CDI CR Gets #2577
Conversation
Get rid of the assumption that CR name is cdi, so tests won't be skippd when CR name is not cdi. Signed-off-by: Arnon Gilboa <agilboa@redhat.com>
cr := &cdis.Items[0] | ||
|
||
return cr, cdiPods | ||
Expect(cdis.Items).To(HaveLen(1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so do we prefer that test will fail because they expect to have at least 1 cdi? or should we skip if len < 1 like somewhat done before:
if len(cdis.Items) < 1 {
Skip("CDI CR does not exist. Probably managed by another operator so skipping.")
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why would you run CDI func tests if you have no CDI on the cluster? failing looks good to me...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah it does seem weird lol I agree
/lgtm |
/lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: awels The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Arnon Gilboa agilboa@redhat.com
What this PR does / why we need it:
Get rid of the assumption that CR name is cdi, so tests won't be skippd when CR name is not cdi.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note: