Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.0] enable live migration with dedicated cpus and isolated emulator thread #11015

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 24, 2024

Conversation

acardace
Copy link
Member

@acardace acardace commented Jan 12, 2024

Manual cherry-pick of #9722 + make generate run to fix dates.

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist

This checklist is not enforcing, but it's a reminder of items that could be relevant to every PR.
Approvers are expected to review this list.

Release note:

NONE

Blocking live migration with isolated emulator thread was introduced
due to a misunderstanding: there is nothing that prevents a VM, with
isolated emulator thread, to be live migrated (since the
VM configuration, including emulator thread isolation, happens at
VM initialization time).

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added dco-signoff: no Indicates the PR's author has not DCO signed all their commits. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jan 12, 2024
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API size/L release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jan 12, 2024
Signed-off-by: Antonio Cardace <acardace@redhat.com>
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. and removed dco-signoff: no Indicates the PR's author has not DCO signed all their commits. labels Jan 12, 2024
@fossedihelm
Copy link
Contributor

I don't know if there will be conflicts with #11012
/lgtm

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 12, 2024
@acardace
Copy link
Member Author

I don't know if there will be conflicts with #11012 /lgtm

Let's see if this passes all tests before that one, in that case we'll hold #11012

@acardace
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@dhiller
Copy link
Contributor

dhiller commented Jan 19, 2024

/test pull-kubevirt-goveralls

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

@dhiller: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-kubevirt-apidocs-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-build-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-build-arm64-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-check-unassigned-tests-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-client-python-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-ipv6-sig-network-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-compute-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-compute-cgroupsv2-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-compute-migrations-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-network-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-operator-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-performance-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-storage-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-storage-cgroupsv2-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-sig-compute-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-sig-monitoring-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-sig-network-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-sig-operator-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-sig-storage-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-compute-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-network-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-operator-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-storage-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-1.25-vgpu-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-1.27-sriov-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-windows2016-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-generate-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-manifests-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-prom-rules-verify-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-unit-test-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-verify-go-mod-1.0

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test build-kubevirt-builder-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-check-tests-for-flakes-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-code-lint-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-arm64-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-fips-sig-compute-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-ipv6-sig-network-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-sig-network-multus-v4-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-single-node-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-swap-enabled-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-gosec-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-goveralls-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-unit-test-arm64-1.0
  • /test pull-kubevirt-verify-rpms-1.0

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-kubevirt-apidocs-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-build-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-build-arm64-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-check-tests-for-flakes-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-check-unassigned-tests-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-client-python-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-code-lint-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-arm64-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-ipv6-sig-network-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-compute-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-compute-migrations-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-network-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-operator-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-performance-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.25-sig-storage-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-sig-compute-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-sig-network-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-sig-operator-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.26-sig-storage-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-compute-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-network-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-operator-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-storage-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-1.25-vgpu-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-1.27-sriov-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-e2e-windows2016-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-generate-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-goveralls-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-manifests-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-prom-rules-verify-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-unit-test-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-unit-test-arm64-1.0
  • pull-kubevirt-verify-go-mod-1.0

In response to this:

/test pull-kubevirt-goveralls

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dhiller
Copy link
Contributor

dhiller commented Jan 19, 2024

@acardace how can this be a manual cherry pick of #9722, which has only 2 changed files with a couple of lines removed?

@dhiller
Copy link
Contributor

dhiller commented Jan 19, 2024

I would at least expect some explanation which backports had to be made additionally in the PR description, so people can follow along.

@acardace
Copy link
Member Author

acardace commented Jan 19, 2024

I would at least expect some explanation which backports had to be made additionally in the PR description, so people can follow along.

It wasn't an additional backport, I just had to run make generate separately and I did a separate commit for that so that it's pretty clear that this is a backport + make generate.

https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pull/11015/commits

@dhiller
Copy link
Contributor

dhiller commented Jan 23, 2024

I would at least expect some explanation which backports had to be made additionally in the PR description, so people can follow along.

It wasn't an additional backport, I just had to run make generate separately and I did a separate commit for that so that it's pretty clear that this is a backport + make generate.

https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pull/11015/commits

Thank you for clarifying, and I'll take the blame of not backporting the year removal fix :(

Copy link
Contributor

@dhiller dhiller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dhiller

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 23, 2024
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

kubevirt-bot commented Jan 23, 2024

@acardace: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubevirt-goveralls 49e86ec link false /test pull-kubevirt-goveralls-1.0

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit b5e06f1 into kubevirt:release-1.0 Jan 24, 2024
33 of 34 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. kind/api-change Categorizes issue or PR as related to adding, removing, or otherwise changing an API lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/L
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants