Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

e2e,sysprep: Fix VMI namespace for sysprep test #11738

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Apr 20, 2024

Conversation

brianmcarey
Copy link
Member

What this PR does

Currently the periodic-kubevirt-e2e-sysprep test lane is failing trying to create a VMI without a namespace[1].

Update the test to include the namespace.

Successful run with this change: https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/logs/periodic-kubevirt-e2e-sysprep/1780626069154435072

[1] https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/logs/periodic-kubevirt-e2e-sysprep/1780385919203807232

Fixes #

Why we need it and why it was done in this way

The following tradeoffs were made:

The following alternatives were considered:

Links to places where the discussion took place:

Special notes for your reviewer

Checklist

This checklist is not enforcing, but it's a reminder of items that could be relevant to every PR.
Approvers are expected to review this list.

Release note

NONE

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. label Apr 18, 2024
@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. label Apr 18, 2024
@brianmcarey
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @dhiller

cm := libconfigmap.New("sysprepautounattend", map[string]string{"Autounattend.xml": answerFileWithKey, "Unattend.xml": answerFileWithKey})
cm, err := virtClient.CoreV1().ConfigMaps(windowsVMI.Namespace).Create(context.Background(), cm, metav1.CreateOptions{})
cm, err := virtClient.CoreV1().ConfigMaps(windowsVMI.ObjectMeta.Namespace).Create(context.Background(), cm, metav1.CreateOptions{})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't testsuite.GetTestNamespace(windowsVMI) enough?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes there was no need for the update to the configmap - i've removed that and tested it here - https://prow.ci.kubevirt.io/view/gs/kubevirt-prow/logs/periodic-kubevirt-e2e-sysprep/1780860358886428672

Signed-off-by: Brian Carey <bcarey@redhat.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@dhiller dhiller left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 19, 2024
@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dhiller

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 19, 2024
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

Required labels detected, running phase 2 presubmits:
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-windows2016
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-1.27-vgpu
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-kind-sriov
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.29-ipv6-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-storage
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-compute
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.27-sig-operator
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-network
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-storage
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-compute
/test pull-kubevirt-e2e-k8s-1.28-sig-operator

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-bot
Copy link
Contributor

kubevirt-bot commented Apr 19, 2024

@brianmcarey: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubevirt-conformance-arm64 4df23de link false /test pull-kubevirt-conformance-arm64

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

1 similar comment
@kubevirt-commenter-bot
Copy link

/retest-required
This bot automatically retries required jobs that failed/flaked on approved PRs.
Silence the bot with an /lgtm cancel or /hold comment for consistent failures.

@kubevirt-bot kubevirt-bot merged commit d1284df into kubevirt:main Apr 20, 2024
36 of 37 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. dco-signoff: yes Indicates the PR's author has DCO signed all their commits. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants