Reduce restrictions on targer in mappings #261
Conversation
We allow for target not to be there and we would use defaults. Signed-off-by: Piotr Kliczewski <piotr.kliczewski@gmail.com>
@suomiy FYI |
/retest |
2 similar comments
/retest |
/retest |
/test pull-vm-import-operator-e2e-k8s-1.16 |
/retest |
/test pull-vm-import-operator-e2e-k8s-1.16 |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jakub-dzon, machacekondra, pkliczewski The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@jakub-dzon could you update design doc about this change ? for each type disk-mapping/storage-mapping/network-mapping what is assumed to be the defaults to be set by the controller. |
Sure, I will. |
We allow for target not to be there and we would use defaults.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Kliczewski piotr.kliczewski@gmail.com