enhancement(plugin): Support inter-pod affinity and anti-affinity at NUMA level

[yanxiaoqi932]

What type of PR is this?

Enhancement

What this PR does / why we need it:

Support inter-pod affinity and anti-affinity at NUMA level，#220

[CLAassistant]

All committers have signed the CLA.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 311 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (ec556bf) 53.79% compared to head (4b6dcdd) 54.14%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files	Patch %	Lines
...g/scheduler/plugins/numainterpodaffinity/filter.go	69.57%	75 Missing and 26 partials ⚠️
pkg/scheduler/cache/cache.go	43.10%	29 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
pkg/scheduler/cache/nodeinfo.go	66.66%	24 Missing and 9 partials ⚠️
pkg/scheduler/util/qos.go	29.54%	25 Missing and 6 partials ⚠️
pkg/util/native/pod_resource.go	24.24%	25 Missing ⚠️
pkg/util/affinity/inter_pod_affinity.go	90.68%	18 Missing and 5 partials ⚠️
...-plugins/cpu/dynamicpolicy/policy_hint_handlers.go	71.83%	13 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
...ugins/memory/dynamicpolicy/policy_hint_handlers.go	71.83%	13 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
pkg/scheduler/cache/resourcetopology.go	66.66%	12 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
pkg/util/native/object.go	33.33%	4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
... and 2 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #347      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   53.79%   54.14%   +0.34%     
==========================================
  Files         446      452       +6     
  Lines       49420    50464    +1044     
==========================================
+ Hits        26587    27322     +735     
- Misses      19816    20078     +262     
- Partials     3017     3064      +47     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittest	54.14% <70.06%> (+0.34%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[WangZzzhe]

AssumedPodAffinityInfo is not thread safe, maybe it is better to return a deepcopy ?