Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark the status in the kep-template provisional #1348

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 3, 2020

Conversation

jbarrick-mesosphere
Copy link
Member

I can see why we might mark it "implemented" if we consider this document itself a KEP, however the other fields are mostly fillers as well, so I think it makes sense to mark it provisional by default since a new KEP will always be provisional.

I can see why we might mark it "implemented" if we consider this document itself a KEP, however the other fields are mostly fillers as well, so I think it makes sense to mark it provisional by default since a new KEP will always be provisional.

Signed-off-by: jbarrick@mesosphere.com <jbarrick@mesosphere.com>
@jbarrick-mesosphere
Copy link
Member Author

This was bugging me when I started writing my 4th KEP this week 😂

Copy link
Contributor

@zen-dog zen-dog left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@ANeumann82 ANeumann82 merged commit 9c8d6bc into master Mar 3, 2020
@ANeumann82 ANeumann82 deleted the jbarrick-mesosphere-patch-1 branch March 3, 2020 16:04
runyontr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2020
I can see why we might mark it "implemented" if we consider this document itself a KEP, however the other fields are mostly fillers as well, so I think it makes sense to mark it provisional by default since a new KEP will always be provisional.

Signed-off-by: jbarrick@mesosphere.com <jbarrick@mesosphere.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Runyon <runyontr@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants