Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Split ontologicalType #14

Closed
simongray opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

Split ontologicalType #14

simongray opened this issue Aug 31, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@simongray
Copy link
Member

Rather than being represented as a single triples containing the current text literal (e.g. "BoundedEvent+Agentive+Mental+Purpose"), the ontological type(s) should be represented as a set of triples - one for each of the types contained in the text.

Searches for a prototypical collection of ontological types can still happen, but with this change the types can also be queried individually.

They seem to be derived from https://archive.illc.uva.nl/EuroWordNet/corebcs/ewnTopOntology.html although no OWL schema exists, so the relation and the concepts themselves will still have to be part of a DanNet OWL schema rather than an external one.
@simongray simongray added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 31, 2021
@simongray
Copy link
Member Author

(the OWL part is related to #7 )

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@simongray