Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: added MADR for MeshRateLimit #5333

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Nov 22, 2022
Merged

Conversation

lukidzi
Copy link
Contributor

@lukidzi lukidzi commented Nov 16, 2022

  • Link to docs PR or issue --
  • Link to UI issue or PR --
  • Is the issue worked on linked? -- fix: New RateLimit design #4740
  • The PR does not hardcode values that might break projects that depend on kuma (e.g. "kumahq" as a image registry) --
  • The PR will work for both Linux and Windows, system specific functions like syscall.Mkfifo have equivalent implementation on the other OS --
  • Unit Tests --
  • E2E Tests --
  • Manual Universal Tests --
  • Manual Kubernetes Tests --
  • Do you need to update UPGRADE.md? --
  • Does it need to be backported according to the backporting policy? --
  • Do you need to explicitly set a > Changelog: entry here or add a ci/ label to run fewer/more tests?

Signed-off-by: Łukasz Dziedziak <lukidzi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Dziedziak <lukidzi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Dziedziak <lukidzi@gmail.com>
@lukidzi lukidzi added the ci/skip-test PR: Don't run unit and e2e tests (maybe this is just a doc change) label Nov 16, 2022
@lukidzi lukidzi requested a review from a team as a code owner November 16, 2022 14:48
@lukidzi lukidzi changed the title docs(madr): added MADR for MeshRateLimit docs: added MADR for MeshRateLimit Nov 16, 2022
Copy link
Contributor

@lahabana lahabana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great start! I'd like us anticipate potentially having a global rate limit in this policy in the future.

Might be worth to have something like:

default:
  local:
     http: ...

Also it might be useful to have a disabled flag to be potentially used when overriding defaults in child policy. I'm not sure how we'd do this other @lobkovilya interested in your opinion here.

docs/madr/decisions/011-rate-limit-policy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/madr/decisions/011-rate-limit-policy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/madr/decisions/011-rate-limit-policy.md Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/madr/decisions/011-rate-limit-policy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/madr/decisions/011-rate-limit-policy.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@lahabana
Copy link
Contributor

Please reference the issue in this PR!

Signed-off-by: Łukasz Dziedziak <lukidzi@gmail.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@lahabana lahabana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

SOme minor comments but looking good!

docs/madr/decisions/011-rate-limit-policy.md Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/madr/decisions/011-rate-limit-policy.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Charly Molter <charly@molter.io>
Signed-off-by: Łukasz Dziedziak <lukidzi@gmail.com>
lukidzi and others added 3 commits November 21, 2022 17:18
Copy link
Contributor

@lahabana lahabana left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Signed-off-by: Łukasz Dziedziak <lukidzi@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci/skip-test PR: Don't run unit and e2e tests (maybe this is just a doc change)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

New RateLimit design
4 participants