Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: destroying the current reverse proxy if it can't be used to create a new one during the CreateReverseProxy process #1991

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 20, 2023

Conversation

leoporoli
Copy link
Contributor

Description:

destroying the current reverse proxy if it can't be used to create a new one during the CreateReverseProxy process

Is this change user facing?

NO

References (if applicable):

should fix the error reported by Barnabas here

@leoporoli leoporoli added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 20, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit 82d1565 Dec 20, 2023
37 checks passed
@leoporoli leoporoli deleted the lporoli/recreate-proxy-container branch December 20, 2023 16:22
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 20, 2023
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[0.85.53](0.85.52...0.85.53)
(2023-12-20)


### Bug Fixes

* change restart policy to always
([#1996](#1996))
([c41583d](c41583d))
* destroying the current reverse proxy if it can't be used to create a
new one during the `CreateReverseProxy` process
([#1991](#1991))
([82d1565](82d1565))
* nil pointer error found in the `kurtosis clean -a` cmd, adding remove
reverse proxy container function when it already exists
([#1995](#1995))
([64eff3e](64eff3e))
* websocket keep-alive
([#1993](#1993))
([509c508](509c508))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: kurtosisbot <kurtosisbot@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants