Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes for both report builds and PR comment workflow #495

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 10, 2024

Conversation

H-Plus-Time
Copy link
Contributor

The report builds should resolve properly in this PR's actions, the PR comment stuff will only work after merging.

@kylebarron
Copy link
Owner

Is it expected that CI on this PR still fails?

Account for broken asset generation in target branch
@H-Plus-Time
Copy link
Contributor Author

H-Plus-Time commented Apr 10, 2024

Alright, resolved for cases where the target branch has output asset manifests literally containing null.

I think no-default-features isn't quite right for mimicking what used to be the arrow1 subset, I'll have a look at an older copy and see what is actually equivalent.

Yep, both the slim and sync builds were previously overestimating the bundle size (by ~all compressions + async for slim, all compressions for sync). Should be much more accurate now.

…er' (sans compressions, unlike prior builds that did not exclude default features). Also correct the sync report build 😞
@kylebarron
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

@kylebarron kylebarron merged commit 2f06d31 into kylebarron:main Apr 10, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants