Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implementation of the converter for provider specific config for GCP #248

Conversation

akgalwas
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Changes proposed in this pull request:

  • Support for GCP provider specific config added

Related issue(s)
#206

@akgalwas akgalwas requested a review from a team as a code owner May 31, 2024 15:06
@kyma-bot kyma-bot added cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 31, 2024
@akgalwas akgalwas changed the title First implementation fo the provider specific config for GCP Implementation of the provider specific config for GCP Jun 3, 2024
@akgalwas akgalwas changed the title Implementation of the provider specific config for GCP Implementation of the converter for provider specific config for GCP Jun 3, 2024
Copy link
Member

@Disper Disper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For aws and azure the go file is named provider_specific_config.go while for gcp and ccee it's providerspecificconfig.go. Could you align those?

Copy link
Member

@Disper Disper left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM + verified that it works

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ func GetInfrastructureConfig(workerCIDR string, zones []string) ([]byte, error)
return json.Marshal(NewInfrastructureConfig(workerCIDR, zones))
}

func GetControlPlaneConfig() ([]byte, error) {
func GetControlPlaneConfig(_ []string) ([]byte, error) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can this parameter be omitted?

@kyma-bot kyma-bot added the lgtm Looks good to me! label Jun 3, 2024
@kyma-bot kyma-bot merged commit aa79954 into kyma-project:main Jun 3, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CLA. lgtm Looks good to me! size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants