-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Apply retroactively? #28
Comments
Yes, you can do this already by calling the |
Here's how I accomplished it:
The This script is great, by the way. Now, if only there was a way to get |
Thanks, that was about the command I would have imagined. Have you tried with Note sure what you mean about |
No, I only tried
Hah, you're totally right, forgot to install it after running the |
The |
Yes, took about 10 seconds :) thanks for your help |
Pleasure. Close the issue if you're satisfied! :) |
Thanks for this. It worked great. Any reason it's not been added to the README yet? Here's an update that uses --index-filter and operates on all ipynb-files in the repo:
If the repo is large and the notebooks are in a subdirectory it will run faster with Naturally, if your repo contains mainly notebooks, you might as well use --tree-filter:
|
@belteshassar Good point adding it to the README, will do that. |
Hi, I am a bit late to the party, but can we update this to use I am not very familiar with it though so can't really tell you the exact command. |
Thanks, good suggestion! I hadn't heard for
If anyone has experience and wants to send a PR I'm happy to consider! |
Hi, sorry if this is already possible, but it would be great to apply this retroactively to a repository where I have already committed notebook files with output. I would think this would involve some kind of filter-branch wizardry. Is it already possible? Is this a feature you would want added?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: