Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updated tests to use trustLocalhost() for bypassing broken HTTPS #553

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Updated tests to use trustLocalhost() for bypassing broken HTTPS #553

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

tejashah88
Copy link
Contributor

Addresses issues #396, #146 and #549.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 381

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.285%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 379: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 136
Relevant Lines: 140

💛 - Coveralls

2 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 381

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.285%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 379: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 136
Relevant Lines: 140

💛 - Coveralls

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 381

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 97.285%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 379: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 136
Relevant Lines: 140

💛 - Coveralls

@gjohnson gjohnson self-requested a review March 8, 2019 08:49
@gjohnson
Copy link
Contributor

gjohnson commented Mar 8, 2019

@rimiti I can't cause any regressions with existing or new tests. I'm slightly confused what #534 actually addressed. Also, historically we would keep superagent and supertest versioned similarly since any breaking superagent changes will generally affect supertest as well -- How about we just call this v4.0.0, whether you can find regressions or not. Thoughts?

@rimiti
Copy link
Contributor

rimiti commented Mar 8, 2019

@gjohnson Yes, the superagent update can cause regressions (a breaking change), I'm totally agree to tagging it v4.0.0. I'm working on it (use-trust-localhost branch). I'll release today. 🚀

Thanks @gjohnson and @tejashah88 for your work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants