Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why are RFC 7624 and RFC 8376 listed as normative references? #376

Closed
malishav opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Why are RFC 7624 and RFC 8376 listed as normative references? #376

malishav opened this issue Dec 7, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@malishav
Copy link
Contributor

malishav commented Dec 7, 2022

Could these two references be listed as informative?
gselander added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 8, 2022
@gselander
refs normative -> informative, #376 + comment by Stephen
e520655
@gselander
Copy link
Collaborator

I-D nits additionally lists these:

** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 5869
** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 6090
** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 6979
** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 7748
** Downref: Normative reference to an Informational RFC: RFC 9053

@malishav
Copy link
Contributor Author

malishav commented Dec 8, 2022

From these above, all but RFC 9053 are in the downref registry [1]. I argued in my write-up that 9053 should be included in that registry, as well.

[1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/downref

@gselander
Copy link
Collaborator

OK. So can we close this?

@malishav
Copy link
Contributor Author

malishav commented Dec 9, 2022

fine by me

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@malishav @gselander