New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider using a different directory for scripts #3401
Comments
I don't know if this is worth changing considering the future of IDE support in Dotty is the Dotty Language Server (which currently doesn't handle building your project but will soon be enhanced to do so by delegating to the sbt server). Eclipse users should be able to work on Dotty projects (including Dotty itself) using LSP4E although I don't think anyone has attempted to do this so far. |
I don't see why we should not do that. I also believe that |
We could change it, but then we'd have to change paths in various places and let people know what the new name is. Doesn't seem worth the effort to me, but feel free to reopen the issue if it's something you want to tackle :). |
It's not something I plan to do, but I am sure this can be contributed by the community |
Given that Dotty will stop being cross compiled with scalac in the very near future, this issue is obsolete util Eclipse implements Dotty support. |
Eclipse by default uses the
bin
directory to put compiled code. The dotty instructions recommend changing this frombin
toclasses
. I maintain sbteclipse and was hoping that we could avoid this extra setup step for our mutual users. I think thatbin
is a fairly generic and vague name that doesn't indicate that you intend for just scripts to be in that directory. Would calling it something likescripts
make its intended usage clearer?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: