Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bagatur/nuclia #8404

Merged
merged 33 commits into from
Aug 5, 2023
Merged

Bagatur/nuclia #8404

merged 33 commits into from
Aug 5, 2023

Conversation

baskaryan
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 28, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
langchain ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Aug 5, 2023 5:43pm

@dosubot dosubot bot added Ɑ: doc loader Related to document loader module (not documentation) 🤖:enhancement A large net-new component, integration, or chain. Use sparingly. The largest features labels Jul 28, 2023
@baskaryan baskaryan added the lgtm PR looks good. Use to confirm that a PR is ready for merging. label Jul 28, 2023
@baskaryan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ebrehault looks like nuclia working with protobuf>3.19 but seems that isn't enforced by the package requirements?

@ebrehault
Copy link
Contributor

@baskaryan right, we need protobuf 4.23, but where should I enforce that to not break other people integration based on protobuf 3?

@baskaryan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@baskaryan right, we need protobuf 4.23, but where should I enforce that to not break other people integration based on protobuf 3?

we definitely shouldn't enforce in langchain, but nucliadb-protos probably should? so that when in CI it's installed it'd force protobuf to be updated. either way can just move the tests to integration tests for now

@baskaryan baskaryan merged commit 9fc9018 into master Aug 5, 2023
22 of 23 checks passed
@baskaryan baskaryan deleted the bagatur/nuclia branch August 5, 2023 17:44
dev2049 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2023
baskaryan added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2023
dev2049 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2023
@ebrehault
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you @baskaryan (sorry for the late answer, I was on vacation).
I will fix the nucliadb-protos deps.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ɑ: doc loader Related to document loader module (not documentation) 🤖:enhancement A large net-new component, integration, or chain. Use sparingly. The largest features lgtm PR looks good. Use to confirm that a PR is ready for merging.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants