Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make openapi_schema_pydantic opt #9408

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Aug 17, 2023
Merged

Conversation

baskaryan
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Aug 17, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
langchain ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Aug 17, 2023 6:21pm

@dosubot dosubot bot added the 🤖:improvement Medium size change to existing code to handle new use-cases label Aug 17, 2023
def test_parse_api_operations(
spec_name: str, spec: OpenAPISpec, path: str, method: str
) -> None:
@pytest.mark.requires("openapi_schema_pydantic")
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i think we'll need to move it to integration tests with the requires marker right now

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ah shoot forgot to add to extended test, but why move to integration? are we gonna run extended test with pydantic v2 at some pt

@baskaryan baskaryan merged commit 8c98622 into master Aug 17, 2023
27 checks passed
@baskaryan baskaryan deleted the bagatur/openapi_schema_optional branch August 17, 2023 18:49
zizhong pushed a commit to opaque-systems/langchain that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🤖:improvement Medium size change to existing code to handle new use-cases
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants