Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

core[minor]: Add runId to RunnableConfig #4954

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Apr 4, 2024

Conversation

bracesproul
Copy link
Collaborator

Not implemented for LLMs yet. Py is very different from JS with base implementation, so it's not as simple as translate syntax

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 2, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
langchainjs-api-refs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 4, 2024 0:54am
langchainjs-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 4, 2024 0:54am

@bracesproul bracesproul marked this pull request as ready for review April 2, 2024 02:03
@dosubot dosubot bot added size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. auto:improvement Medium size change to existing code to handle new use-cases labels Apr 2, 2024
@@ -1520,17 +1539,19 @@ export class RunnableSequence<
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey team, just a heads up that this PR introduces a new asynchronous HTTP request using the handleChainStart method. This comment is to flag the change for maintainers to review the addition of this new request. Let me know if you have any questions or need further clarification!

undefined,
extra,
undefined,
undefined,
handledOptions.runName
);

// eslint-disable-next-line no-param-reassign
delete handledOptions.runId;
Copy link
Collaborator

@jacoblee93 jacoblee93 Apr 3, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See above

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

there is no above?

@jacoblee93
Copy link
Collaborator

See comments - also, why not implement for LLMs too?

@jacoblee93 jacoblee93 added the question Further information is requested label Apr 3, 2024
@bracesproul
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jacoblee93 added to LLMs, added some tests and cleaned up a couple other places. Should be good to go now

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto:improvement Medium size change to existing code to handle new use-cases question Further information is requested size:L This PR changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants