Adds additional text/event-stream encodign format for streamEvents #5234
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:L
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
dosubot
bot
added
the
auto:improvement
![dosubot[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/324583?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
langchain-core/src/runnables/base.ts
Outdated
| @@ -729,7 +730,38 @@ export abstract class Runnable< | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey there! This comment is to flag the addition of a new HTTP request handling logic using the streamEvents method in the base.ts file. This change is being flagged for maintainers to review and ensure it aligns with the project's requirements. Great work on the update!
bracesproul
approved these changes
May 3, 2024
This was referenced Jun 11, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@bracesproul @eyurtsev not sure on form factor, we could just expose the helper method instead