Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: change logical operator in Graph class improving API usage #2838

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 22, 2024

Conversation

anovazzi1
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes a logical operator in the Graph class that was causing incorrect filtering of vertices based on input components. The operator was changed from "or" to "and" to ensure that both conditions are met before skipping the vertex. This resolves an issue where certain vertices were being skipped incorrectly.

Fixes a logical operator in the Graph class that was causing incorrect filtering of vertices based on input components. The operator was changed from "or" to "and" to ensure that both conditions are met before skipping the vertex. This resolves an issue where certain vertices were being skipped incorrectly.
@dosubot dosubot bot added size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. bug Something isn't working labels Jul 19, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request Validation Report

This comment is automatically generated by Conventional PR

Whitelist Report

Whitelist Active Result
Pull request is a draft and should be ignored
Pull request is made by a whitelisted user and should be ignored
Pull request is submitted by a bot and should be ignored
Pull request is submitted by administrators and should be ignored

Result

Pull request does not satisfy any enabled whitelist criteria. Pull request will be validated.

Validation Report

Validation Active Result
All commits in this pull request has valid messages
Pull request does not introduce too many changes
Pull request has a valid title
Pull request has mentioned issues
Pull request has valid branch name
Pull request should have a non-empty body

Result

Pull request satisfies all enabled pull request rules.

Last Modified at 19 Jul 24 18:14 UTC

@anovazzi1 anovazzi1 changed the title refactor: fix logical operator in Graph class fix: change logical operator in Graph class improving API usage Jul 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping and removed bug Something isn't working labels Jul 19, 2024
@anovazzi1
Copy link
Contributor Author

fix #2807

@github-actions github-actions bot added bug Something isn't working and removed refactor Maintenance tasks and housekeeping labels Jul 19, 2024
@anovazzi1 anovazzi1 added the fix Bug fixes and patches label Jul 19, 2024
Copy link

This pull request is automatically being deployed by Amplify Hosting (learn more).

Access this pull request here: https://pr-2838.dmtpw4p5recq1.amplifyapp.com

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Jul 22, 2024
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz merged commit 3c1cacb into main Jul 22, 2024
15 checks passed
@ogabrielluiz ogabrielluiz deleted the fix#2807 branch July 22, 2024 16:04
anovazzi1 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 22, 2024
refactor: fix logical operator in Graph class

Fixes a logical operator in the Graph class that was causing incorrect filtering of vertices based on input components. The operator was changed from "or" to "and" to ensure that both conditions are met before skipping the vertex. This resolves an issue where certain vertices were being skipped incorrectly.

Co-authored-by: Cristhian Zanforlin Lousa <72977554+Cristhianzl@users.noreply.github.com>
nicoloboschi pushed a commit to datastax/ragstack-ai-langflow that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2024
…flow-ai#2838)

refactor: fix logical operator in Graph class

Fixes a logical operator in the Graph class that was causing incorrect filtering of vertices based on input components. The operator was changed from "or" to "and" to ensure that both conditions are met before skipping the vertex. This resolves an issue where certain vertices were being skipped incorrectly.

Co-authored-by: Cristhian Zanforlin Lousa <72977554+Cristhianzl@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 3c1cacb)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working fix Bug fixes and patches lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:XS This PR changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
3 participants