Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[en] Not found: studies have show that lobyist have #4841

Open
MikeUnwalla opened this issue Apr 17, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

[en] Not found: studies have show that lobyist have #4841

MikeUnwalla opened this issue Apr 17, 2021 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@MikeUnwalla
Copy link
Contributor

Noted in https://internal1.languagetool.org/regression-tests/via-http/2021-04-17/en-US/result_grammar_PLURAL_VERB_AFTER_THIS[2].html

Before my change to the disambiguation for 'have', PLURAL_VERB_AFTER_THIS[2] gave a warning for 'have' and suggested 'has':

... studies have show that lobbyist have become less influential in ...

That suggestion is not correct, so I will not change PLURAL_VERB_AFTER_THIS[2] such that it gives a warning. A better correction is:

... studies have shown that lobbyists have become less influential in ...

@AzadehSafakish
Copy link
Collaborator

I've updated the rule to suggest both forms:

lobbyist has
lobbyists have

udomai pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 26, 2021
* [en] improve PLURAL_VERB_AFTER_THIS

* [en] include NN:UN

* [en] temp off
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants