Conversation
Thanks for taking a shot at this @mmachatschek , much appreciated. You're now essentially combining the behaviour of three Interval generators in one. I think it would be better to split them up in three simple classes, all implementing the same Interval(Generator)Contract. Then in the plan config, you could swap the generator out depending on your use case. The current What do you think? |
@sandervanhooft sounds great! I'll update the PR and bump you as soon as you can have another look! |
@sandervanhooft the PR now contains extendable |
One more issue appeared upon going threw this. See |
|
@mmachatschek you have a typo on |
@sandervanhooft I'm closing this for now due to lack of time. If anyone else wants to pick up parts from this PR, feel free! |
No description provided.