New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Variable names for models with no model.frame method #63
Comments
This is a good point. Maybe in that case var_type needs to be populated with "unknown" or something similar. I need to check that out will not break other functions and to do some tests. |
The type for these variables is already indicated as unknown! You're already ahead :) |
10 tasks
Fixed now :-) |
YAY! You're so fast! |
larmarange
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 21, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
When there is no
model.frame()
method, the user sees a very informative message. (super helpful!)The resulting table has column for variable, but the columns are NA. Can we add the term as the variable for these models? In gtsummary, we use the variable name to do further manipulation (and in broom.helpers too), but with no name these variables cannot be selected.
I know the term is not the proper variable name, but I think the printed message is enough of a cue to users that the original variable names are not available.
Created on 2020-10-19 by the reprex package (v0.3.0)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: