use new tag names from latex namespace

required/latex-lab/latex-lab-footnotes.dtx

@@ -407,14 +407,15 @@
 %
 % \subsection{Technical details for the tagging}
 %
-% The \emph{footnotemark} should create a \texttt{/Lbl} structure\footnote{to ease debugging we use
-% \texttt{/FEmarkLbl} which we rolemap to \texttt{/Lbl}} that should contain a \texttt{/Ref} entry pointing
+% The \emph{footnotemark} should create a \texttt{/Lbl} structure\footnote{to make it easier
+% to identify the role we use \texttt{/footnotemark} which we rolemap to \texttt{/Lbl}} that should contain a \texttt{/Ref} entry pointing
 % to the structure of the \emph{footnotetext}.
 %
-% The \emph{footnotetext} should create a \texttt{/FENote} structure with a \texttt{/Ref}
+% The \emph{footnotetext} should create a \texttt{/FENote}\footnote{We tag it as \texttt{/footnote} and role map it.}
+%  structure with a \texttt{/Ref}
 % entry pointing to the structures of \emph{all} marks related to the note.
 % The mark at the begin of the
-% note is in a \texttt{/Lbl}\footnote{We tag it as \texttt{/FENoteLbl} to make debugging easier}
+% note is in a \texttt{/Lbl}\footnote{We tag it as \texttt{/footnotelabel}.}
 % structure but has to fulfil no special requirements.
 %
 % Structure objects and the underlying properties used by the tagging
@@ -1474,20 +1475,9 @@
 % \subsection{Tagging and hyperlink code}
 % \subsubsection{Rolemap for structure tags}
 % We use role-mapping to get more speaking names
-% in the PDF and so ease debugging. These names should probably
-% be supported by tagpdf directly.
-% \begin{NOTE}{UF}
-%  TODO: consider what tagpdf should provide here
-%  TODO: \cs{tagpdfsetup} should be perhaps in tagpdf-base.
-% \end{NOTE}
-%    \begin{macrocode}
-\AtBeginDocument
-  {
-    \tag_if_active:T{\tagpdfsetup{add-new-tag=FEmarkLbl/Lbl}\tagpdfsetup{add-new-tag=FENoteLbl/Lbl}}
-  }
-%    \end{macrocode}
+% in the PDF and so ease debugging. These names are already
+% provided by tagpdf directly.
 %
-
 % \subsubsection{Extending the label system}
 % For \cs{footref} and (perhaps later for labeled footnotes)
 % we must extend the label system.
@@ -1608,7 +1598,7 @@
 % end an open mc and start the structure.
 %    \begin{macrocode}
     \tag_mc_end_push:
-    \tag_struct_begin:n { tag=FEmarkLbl }
+    \tag_struct_begin:n { tag=footnotemark }
 %    \end{macrocode}
 %  The associated note is either auto detected
 %  or given by the user.
@@ -1699,16 +1689,16 @@
 \cs_new_protected:Npn \tag@FENote #1#2 % #1 config point, \insert\footins  #2 content
   {
     \tag_mc_end_push:
-    \tag_struct_begin:n { tag=FENote }
+    \tag_struct_begin:n { tag=footnote }
 %    \end{macrocode}
 % Store the current structure number for labels.
 %    \begin{macrocode}
     \tl_set:Nx \l_@@_currentstruct_tl { \tag_get:n{struct_num} }
 %    \end{macrocode}
-% We want to move the label structure here. So we provide a NonStruct as a container
+% We want to move the label structure here. So we provide a container
 % It number is |\l__fnote_currentstruct_tl| plus 1.
 %    \begin{macrocode}
-    \tag_struct_begin:n { tag=NonStruct }\tag_struct_end:
+    \tag_struct_begin:n { tag=footnotelabel }\tag_struct_end:
 %    \end{macrocode}
 % after we have opened the structure we can use the structure number to
 % try to detect the connected marks. As with the marks we assume that sometimes
@@ -1788,9 +1778,12 @@
 %    \end{macrocode}
 % now we add the tagging commands. We move the structure of the label to
 % to the container at the begin of the note.
+% \begin{NOTE}{UF}
+% check if the NonStruct is really needed. Perhaps we can simply move the mc.
+% \end{NOTE}
 %    \begin{macrocode}
-     \tag_struct_begin:n { tag=FENoteLbl,parent=\l_@@_currentstruct_tl +1 }
-      \tag_mc_begin:n { tag=FENoteLbl }
+     \tag_struct_begin:n { tag=NonStruct,parent=\l_@@_currentstruct_tl +1 }
+      \tag_mc_begin:n { tag=Lbl }
        #1
       \tag_mc_end:
      \tag_struct_end: