-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 263
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tracking external font package issues #299
Comments
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
mathdesign
Workaroundnot needed Fixcorrect the font declarations., |
@FrankMittelbach how do I mark a comment as resolved? (the ccfonts problem) |
select the "..." in the top right corner of the comment, choose "hide" and give reason "resolved". That's the best I can think of if we have a summary issue like this. Otherwise you need an issue for each problem separately. |
tgadventor
The
This should be changed to
to avoid that the definition affects all families. |
I wouldn't be surprised if that is similar for all TeX Gyre fonts, so there are probably several such font packages (I think all with the same mentainer(s)) |
This warning existed on Overleaf in TeX Live 2021, but seems to no longer exist for TeX Live 2022 (both using XeLaTeX). I don't know much about this, but is this sufficient to mark it as resolved? Not sure what changed, but I've been following this one a while, glad it isn't causing -me- any problems anymore, anyway :) |
it is not actually causing problems, but it is not resolved in TL2022 the fd files are still wrong and the warning is generated (not sure if Overleaf does something to supress it but I would be surprised if they have done somehting like that). |
Here is a MWE for pdfLaTeX. This gives a warning in Overleaf in pdfLaTeX and 2021 but no warning in pdfLaTeX and 2022. Is this warning getting generated in other compilers? EDIT: i see this is the same MWE you have but with different document class. I just used your exact MWE and got the same thing: warning with 2021, no warning with 2022 \documentclass{article} |
It gives a warning in texlive 2021
but only an info in texlive 2022
and overleaf seems to handle this differently.
you shouldn't use this package with xelatex, it will select the wrong font encoding for an unicode engine. |
I believe you are mistaken here Ulrike. The package defines math alphabets if I remember correctly and if you don't use unicode-math then math alphabets are selected using traditional NFSS even in XeLaTeX. Anyway, yes we changed the Warning to Info at some point in the past because for ordinary users it doesn't help to get a warning or this. |
I take it back ... just checked .. it also sets up text fonts ..., so yes not good for Unicode engines |
Well with a following \usepackage{fontspec} + setup of the text fonts, it would work, so not completly useless. |
@flyingpurplepeopleeater FYI: I sent the author an email with a patch in March 2021, did not yet get a reply... |
yes, but if you want to set up only thee math then other packages are probably better, e.g., mathalphabets |
The following issue tries to track packages which have issues with the new code (
LaTeX2e <2020-02-02> patch level 5
) to select series and shapes. It should be edited if issues are resolved or new issues appear. .I (Frank) suggest we provide one thread entry per issue (done). This way we can "hide" resolved issues or otherwise mark them.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: