Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add shutdown test cases #74

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jens-diewald
Copy link
Contributor

This should not be merged in the current state but is rather supposed to show of a difference between Asio.SSL and WinTLS: Asio will produce a stream_truncated error on shutdown, if the remote did not properly shut down the protocol while WinTLS will not.

Note https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25587403/boost-asio-ssl-async-shutdown-always-finishes-with-an-error

Also, according to that post, Asio should produce an error if it initiated the shutdown and it goes through without problem.
This does not seem to be the case (anymore?).
This is relevant for the https examples in WinTLS. Currently the https async example handles asio::error::eof (as do the beast examples async+sync), while the sync example does not.

This should not be merged in the current state but is rather supposed
to show of a difference between Asio.SSL and WinTLS:
Asio will produce a stream_truncated error on shutdown, if the remote
did not properly shut down the protocol while WinTLS will not.

Note https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25587403/boost-asio-ssl-async-shutdown-always-finishes-with-an-error

Also, according to that post, Asio should produce an error if it initiated the
shutdown and it goes through without problem.
This does not seem to be the case (anymore?).
This is only relevant for the https examples in WinTLS.
Currently the https async example handles asio::error::eof
(as do the beast examples), while the sync example does not.
@laudrup
Copy link
Owner

laudrup commented Jan 6, 2023

Thanks for looking into this.

I'll be happy to merge this once it's done.

@jens-diewald
Copy link
Contributor Author

I close this in favor of #78

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants