This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 21, 2023. It is now read-only.
Use map for interfaces rather than empty objects #57
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This pull request has been linked to Shortcut Story #151732: Escalation: Python API client ApprovalsApi.post_approval_request is unclear what Object is needed to pass into Instructions. |
XieX
deleted the
christie/sc-151732/escalation-python-api-client-approvalsapi
branch
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
At least the generated python client (but potentially others as well) don't deal so well with empty objects. This update specs an
interfaceas a map of[string] -> any.