Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PRT-343 reach by default to maximum number of connections available #263

Conversation

ranlavanet
Copy link
Contributor

  • Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements
  • Commit message follows the Contribution Guidelines
  • Tests ran locally and added/modified if needed
  • Docs have been added/updated, if applicable
  • If applicable - JIRA ticket ID was added
  • What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, unit tests, docs update, ...)
    adding and removing clients as the provider gets heavier usage

  • What is the current behavior? (You can also link to an open issue here)
    constant number of clients when starting

  • What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?
    adding and removing clients as the provider gets heavier usage

  • Please describe what manual tests you ran, if applicable
    added unit tests and ran them

  • Other information:

@ranlavanet ranlavanet changed the title PRT-343 we would like to reach by default to maximum number of connections available by the node just keep trying to increase until maximum number of connections reached can do it in parallel PRT-343 we would like to reach by default to maximum number of connections available Jan 25, 2023
@ranlavanet ranlavanet changed the title PRT-343 we would like to reach by default to maximum number of connections available PRT-343 reach by default to maximum number of connections available Jan 25, 2023
relayer/chainproxy/connector.go Show resolved Hide resolved
relayer/chainproxy/connector.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
relayer/chainproxy/connector.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@omerlavanet omerlavanet merged commit dc177fa into main Jan 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants