Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PQM ID Aliases not consistently working #9

Closed
gbaltz opened this issue Oct 4, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

PQM ID Aliases not consistently working #9

gbaltz opened this issue Oct 4, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@gbaltz
Copy link

gbaltz commented Oct 4, 2022

Hi,
Lack of standardization is the bane of all our existence. I'm trying to use the ID Alias feature in the PQM templates, and it seems like it works for some structures and not for others.

For example it is able to successfully associate the alias "Aorta" for "GreatVessels", but it's not able to associate alias "PTV" for "PTV_5000". Or associate alias "LungsMinusGTV" for "LungsMinusITV".

@LDClark
Copy link
Owner

LDClark commented Oct 4, 2022

I definitely agree with you, and have gone back and forth on the best way to implement it. I think there is a trade off of finding all possible matching structures in the list, and possibly getting duplicates. The LungsMinusITV could show up by its structure ID, its alias LungsMinusGTV structure ID, or its structure code 68877.

It might be possible to make the for loops better, or to filter out the duplicates at the end. I'll look at it some more this week.

Thanks!

@LDClark
Copy link
Owner

LDClark commented Oct 7, 2022

There are some new for loops in the new version. Could you let me know if that helps alias matching?

@gbaltz
Copy link
Author

gbaltz commented Oct 27, 2022

Hey, sorry for the delay. I tried it out and it seems like the alias matching is catching everything now! Thanks for the update!

@LDClark
Copy link
Owner

LDClark commented Nov 18, 2022

Good to hear! Thanks for letting me know.

@LDClark LDClark closed this as completed Nov 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants