-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
Minor update for UnLynx v1.4.1 #34
Conversation
IMO small developments/changes like this can go directly to dev. For :
should have its own separate branch. We should also maybe introduce the concept of code owners in our workflow. Whatever we agree on (including @f-marino ), this should go in the guidelines :) Thoughts? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks all good, but something important should be added (and it's not valid just for your changes, but also other things we did before), all the configuration variables should be documented in e.g. the README.md.
Also the CONN_TIMEMOUT
should be added into the deployment/Dockerfile
+ deployment/docker-compose.yml
for reference.
I am working to embed the comments I received on the guidelines from Linus, which actually touch also this topic. I will tell you when I am done, so that you can check it and make sure that both of you are satisfied with the final result. |
done 0a3b954 As for the README I am currently exporting |
@mickmis can I merge this? I think the only thing left is adding the configuration variables to the documentation. I have them in the unlynx README, but I wonder if we should add it someplace else... |
A series of commits to make medco-unlynx on par with the new unlynx v1.4.1 and onet 3.2.0:
Similar changes as https://github.com/ldsec/unlynx/releases/tag/v1.4.1
Out of topic question
For these kind of minor changes do I still do a PR to dev (and then later move to master) or should I just commit directly to dev? It's not that I'm actually developing a new feature or something :P