Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Custom selector improvements #79

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Jul 5, 2022

Conversation

bartekpacia
Copy link
Contributor

@bartekpacia bartekpacia commented Jul 2, 2022

Experimenting with making custom selectors more flexible.

TODO: Create an example app complex enough to show all possibilities of custom selectors. It will also serve as tests for custom selectors themselves.

related to #1, follow up of #75

@bartekpacia bartekpacia marked this pull request as ready for review July 4, 2022 11:34
@bartekpacia bartekpacia force-pushed the feature/custom_selectors_improvements branch from eb79e95 to 0f2593b Compare July 4, 2022 13:39
@bartekpacia bartekpacia merged commit 92f9522 into master Jul 5, 2022
@bartekpacia bartekpacia deleted the feature/custom_selectors_improvements branch July 5, 2022 12:19
bartekpacia added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2022
* make it possible to pass another `MaestroFinder` to `MaestroFinder.withDescendant`

* update readme

* MaestroTester: forward WidgetTester.pump() and WidgetTester.pumpAndSettle()

* add tests

* hit bug with parent finders not working

* add .idea to .gitignore

* fix bug with parent finders not working

* add running tests of `package:maestro_test` to `maestro_test-prepare` workflow

* add first simple tests for MaestroFinder.withDescendant()

* add a truckload of docs

* add more docs

* revamp directory structure to better show what is native and what not
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants