-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(algebra/group/GroupModule): basic definitions of bundled modules over a group #2121
Conversation
Actually, I couldn't resist generalising a bit, from |
@semorrison This is a "Draft" PR. What does that mean? Do you want to merge this, or do you first want more comments? |
Mostly I wanted to try out the "Draft" feature. Somehow I really don't want to argue that this is the best definition for a Certainly we want to provide the equivalence between In any case, I'll click "Ready for review", and we can continue this discussion. |
Ok, I'll tag this RFC for now, and focus on other PRs first. Please feel free to ping me if you want me to look at it again. |
I've completely rewritten this, and will reopen a separate PR later. |
Since @kbuzzard was interested a prototype of group modules, I thought I'd write a version too. This is just a draft PR, and perhaps can wait until either it has more content, or someone actually wants it, but I think might be useful for discussion regarding bundled objects and using the category theory library with them.
The basic definition here is
and it's all "follow your nose" from there.