Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - chore(archive/sensitivity): Clean up function coercion in sensitivity proof (depends on #2756) #2758

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

PatrickMassot
Copy link
Member

This formalizes the proof of an old conjecture: is_awesome Gabriel. I also took the opportunity to remove type class struggling, which I think is related to the proof of is_awesome Floris.
I think @jcommelin should also update this sensitivity file to use his sum notations if applicable.

@robertylewis robertylewis added the blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR which is still in the queue. A bot manages this label via PR comment. label May 20, 2020
@jcommelin
Copy link
Member

@PatrickMassot Done.

@bryangingechen bryangingechen changed the title Clean up function coercion in sensitivity proof (depends on #2756) chore(archive/sensitivity): Clean up function coercion in sensitivity proof (depends on #2756) May 20, 2020
@PatrickMassot PatrickMassot added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR which is still in the queue. A bot manages this label via PR comment. labels May 20, 2020
@sgouezel
Copy link
Collaborator

This is really satisfying. Thanks @gebner !
bors r+

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels May 20, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2020
… proof (depends on #2756) (#2758)

This formalizes the proof of an old conjecture: `is_awesome Gabriel`. I also took the opportunity to remove type class struggling, which I think is related to the proof of `is_awesome Floris`.
I think @jcommelin should also update this sensitivity file to use his sum notations if applicable.

Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented May 20, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title chore(archive/sensitivity): Clean up function coercion in sensitivity proof (depends on #2756) [Merged by Bors] - chore(archive/sensitivity): Clean up function coercion in sensitivity proof (depends on #2756) May 20, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this May 20, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the awesome branch May 20, 2020 20:22
cipher1024 pushed a commit to cipher1024/mathlib that referenced this pull request Mar 15, 2022
… proof (depends on leanprover-community#2756) (leanprover-community#2758)

This formalizes the proof of an old conjecture: `is_awesome Gabriel`. I also took the opportunity to remove type class struggling, which I think is related to the proof of `is_awesome Floris`.
I think @jcommelin should also update this sensitivity file to use his sum notations if applicable.

Co-authored-by: Johan Commelin <johan@commelin.net>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants