Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(ring_theory/algebra_tower): Artin--Tate lemma #4282

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

kckennylau
Copy link
Collaborator


(λ p q _ _ hp hq, hyy $ submodule.mul_mem_mul hp hq)
end

/- Artin--Tate lemma. Atiyah--Macdonald Proposition 7.8; Stacks 00IS; Altman--Kleiman 16.17. -/
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/-- instead of /-? Also, can you explain in the docstring the mathematical content of the theorem, with words?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done.

Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this looks great. Thanks a lot for doing this.

theorem fg_def {S : subalgebra R A} : S.fg ↔ ∃ t : set A, set.finite t ∧ algebra.adjoin R t = S :=
⟨λ ⟨t, ht⟩, ⟨↑t, set.finite_mem_finset t, ht⟩,
λ ⟨t, ht1, ht2⟩, ⟨ht1.to_finset, by rwa set.finite.coe_to_finset⟩⟩

theorem fg_bot : (⊥ : subalgebra R A).fg :=
⟨∅, algebra.adjoin_empty R A⟩

lemma fg_of_submodule_fg (h : (⊤ : submodule R A).fg) : (⊤ : subalgebra R A).fg :=
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we want (⊤ : submodule R A).fg) and (⊤ : subalgebra R A).fg to be the idomatic way of saying module.finite R A and algebra.finite R A? I think I wouldn't mind having those definitions. It looks better, and potentially, those should be classes...

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe in a separate PR.

@jcommelin
Copy link
Member

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

Ok, let's merge this... but I would really like to see that separate PR. 😺

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Sep 28, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2020
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 28, 2020

Build failed (retrying...):

@jcommelin
Copy link
Member

bors r-

CI is failing

@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 28, 2020

Canceled.

@jcommelin
Copy link
Member

Let's try again

bors r+

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2020
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 28, 2020

Build failed (retrying...):

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 28, 2020
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 28, 2020

Build failed:

@robertylewis robertylewis added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) labels Sep 28, 2020
@jcommelin
Copy link
Member

@kckennylau Could you please take a look at what is wrong?

Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Sep 29, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 29, 2020
Co-authored-by: Rob Lewis <Rob.y.lewis@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 29, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(ring_theory/algebra_tower): Artin--Tate lemma [Merged by Bors] - feat(ring_theory/algebra_tower): Artin--Tate lemma Sep 29, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Sep 29, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the artin-tate branch September 29, 2020 06:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants