Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(*): make int.le irreducible #4474

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

robertylewis
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Collaborator

@Vierkantor Vierkantor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. I always enjoy marking definitions irreducible.

bors r+

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Oct 6, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 6, 2020
There's very rarely a reason to unfold `int.le` and it can create trouble: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/topic/deep.20recursion.20was.20detected.20at.20'replace'



Co-authored-by: Rob Lewis <rob.y.lewis@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Oct 6, 2020

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(*): make int.le irreducible [Merged by Bors] - feat(*): make int.le irreducible Oct 6, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Oct 6, 2020
@bors bors bot deleted the linarith-nat branch October 6, 2020 15:22
adomani pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 7, 2020
There's very rarely a reason to unfold `int.le` and it can create trouble: https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/113489-new-members/topic/deep.20recursion.20was.20detected.20at.20'replace'



Co-authored-by: Rob Lewis <rob.y.lewis@gmail.com>
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2020
In #4474, `int.lt` was made irreducible. We make `int.nonneg` irreducible, which is stronger as `int.lt` is expressed in terms of `int.nonneg`.
jcommelin pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2020
In #4474, `int.lt` was made irreducible. We make `int.nonneg` irreducible, which is stronger as `int.lt` is expressed in terms of `int.nonneg`.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants