Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(group_theory/nilpotent): add antimono and functorial lemma for lower central series #8853

Closed
wants to merge 40 commits into from

Conversation

ineswright
Copy link
Collaborator


Open in Gitpod

Note that the more general lemma descending_central_series_antimono I believe is not provable from the current definition of descending central series.

@ineswright ineswright added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Aug 24, 2021
Comment on lines 276 to 277
lemma lower_central_series_antimono (n : ℕ) :
lower_central_series G n.succ ≤ lower_central_series G n :=
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you please generalise this to m \le n, instead of merely n \le n.succ. That will be more useful in practice.
(There must be a suitable induction lemma somewhere in mathlib that reduces the general statement to the current version in 1 or 2 lines.)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have monotone_nat_of_le_succ but we need to apply this to the opposite lattice :-/ . How about defining antitone and antitone_nat_of_succ_le? Or maybe using the opposite lattice is fine if you keep your head.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it shouldn't be too hard to apply it to order_dual nat.

@jcommelin jcommelin added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Aug 26, 2021
src/group_theory/nilpotent.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/group_theory/nilpotent.lean Show resolved Hide resolved
src/group_theory/nilpotent.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@kbuzzard
Copy link
Member

kbuzzard commented Sep 6, 2021

This looks fine to me now.

@ineswright ineswright added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Sep 6, 2021
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Sep 6, 2021
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 6, 2021
…ower central series (#8853)




Co-authored-by: ineswright <52750254+ineswright@users.noreply.github.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 7, 2021

Build failed (retrying...):

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2021
…ower central series (#8853)




Co-authored-by: ineswright <52750254+ineswright@users.noreply.github.com>
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 7, 2021

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(group_theory/nilpotent): add antimono and functorial lemma for lower central series [Merged by Bors] - feat(group_theory/nilpotent): add antimono and functorial lemma for lower central series Sep 7, 2021
@bors bors bot closed this Sep 7, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the nilpotent_ines3 branch September 7, 2021 05:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants