Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/measure/integral): integral over an encodable type #9191

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

[Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/measure/integral): integral over an encodable type #9191

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

urkud
Copy link
Member

@urkud urkud commented Sep 13, 2021

Open in Gitpod

@urkud urkud added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Sep 13, 2021
@sgouezel
Copy link
Collaborator

bors r+

@github-actions github-actions bot added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Sep 14, 2021
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 14, 2021
@urkud
feat(measure_theory/measure/integral): integral over an encodable type (
2d57545 
#9191)
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Sep 14, 2021

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(measure_theory/measure/integral): integral over an encodable type [Merged by Bors] - feat(measure_theory/measure/integral): integral over an encodable type Sep 14, 2021
@bors bors bot closed this Sep 14, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the lintegral-encodable branch September 14, 2021 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@urkud @sgouezel