Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(topology/algebra/group_with_zero): continuity lemma for division #9959

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

fpvandoorn
Copy link
Member

@fpvandoorn fpvandoorn commented Oct 25, 2021


Open in Gitpod

@fpvandoorn fpvandoorn added the awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR label Oct 25, 2021
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Oct 26, 2021

✌️ fpvandoorn can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2021
* This is a note with some tips how to formulate a continuity (or measurability, differentiability, ...) lemma.
* I wanted to write this up after formulating `continuous.strans` in many "wrong" ways before discovering the "right" way.
* I think many lemmas are not following this principle, and could be improved in generality and/or convenience by following this advice.
* Based on experience from the sphere eversion project.
* The note mentions a lemma that will be added in #9959, but I don't think we necessarily have to wait for that PR.
@fpvandoorn fpvandoorn added delegated The PR author may merge after reviewing final suggestions. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Oct 27, 2021
@fpvandoorn
Copy link
Member Author

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Nov 4, 2021
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2021
…#9959)

* This even applies when dividing by `0`.
* From the sphere eversion project.
* This PR mentions `filter.tendsto_prod_top_iff` which is added by #9958
@bors
Copy link

bors bot commented Nov 4, 2021

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot changed the title feat(topology/algebra/group_with_zero): continuity lemma for division [Merged by Bors] - feat(topology/algebra/group_with_zero): continuity lemma for division Nov 4, 2021
@bors bors bot closed this Nov 4, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the div_by_zero_cont branch November 4, 2021 14:47
ericrbg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
* This is a note with some tips how to formulate a continuity (or measurability, differentiability, ...) lemma.
* I wanted to write this up after formulating `continuous.strans` in many "wrong" ways before discovering the "right" way.
* I think many lemmas are not following this principle, and could be improved in generality and/or convenience by following this advice.
* Based on experience from the sphere eversion project.
* The note mentions a lemma that will be added in #9959, but I don't think we necessarily have to wait for that PR.
ericrbg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2021
…#9959)

* This even applies when dividing by `0`.
* From the sphere eversion project.
* This PR mentions `filter.tendsto_prod_top_iff` which is added by #9958
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
delegated The PR author may merge after reviewing final suggestions. ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants